By Timour Azhari
BEIRUT (Reuters) – Iraqi Shi’ite Muslim ruling parties and armed groups are weighing the pros and cons of armed intervention in Syria, viewing as a grave threat the advance of Sunni Islamist rebels who have taken two Syrian cities and now bear down on a third.
Baghdad has a dark history with Syria-based Sunni fighters, thousands of whom crossed into Iraq after the 2003 U.S. invasion and fuelled years of sectarian killing before returning again in 2013 as Islamic State to conquer a third of the country.
The Syrian rebels advancing in Syria today, led by Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, have disavowed Al Qaeda and IS and say they have no ambitions in Iraq, but ruling factions have little trust in those assertions.
Baghdad has amassed on its border with Syria thousands of fighters from its conventional military as well as the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF), a security agency containing many Iran-aligned armed groups that previously fought in Syria.
The orders so far are to defend Iraq’s western flank, rather than to intervene to help Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, according to an Iraqi Shi’ite politician, a government adviser and an Arab diplomat briefed on the matter.
But the calculation could change, at least for some Iraqi factions, depending on developments, including if the rebels take the major Syrian city of Homs, if Assad falls, or if Shi’ites are persecuted, the sources said.
Reuters previously reported that hundreds of Iraqi fighters had crossed into Syria to help bolster Assad’s forces, joining Iraqi and Lebanese Hezbollah fighters already in the country, but there has not yet been a mass-mobilization from Iraq.
“The Iraqi government’s stance from the beginning has been that Iraq is not a side in this crisis,” said Falih al-Fayadh, leader of the PMF in a televised speech on Friday.
“But it is not wise for there to be a fire in your neighbour’s house while you sleep reassured without thinking of what might happen,” he said.
SUDANI SEEKS TO AVOID REGIONAL CONFLICT
Led by a coalition of mostly Shi’ite political parties and armed groups close to Iran, Iraq is a major player in Tehran’s so-called Axis of Resistance that includes Hamas in Gaza and Lebanese Hezbollah.
Israeli onslaughts have heavily impaired the latter two players, leading some analysts to assess that the tens of thousands of hardened fighters in Iraq’s armed formations are now the force in Iran’s network of allies best-placed to intervene in Syria.
But the country’s government, led by moderate Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani, has tried desperately to avoid being dragged into spiralling regional conflict, instead trying to focus on rebuilding after decades of war.
The ruling coalition is often pulled in different directions, with some groups that fought alongside Assad in the past and have interests in Syria more partial to entering again, while other parties see such an intervention as destabilising.
Iraqi Foreign Minister Fuad Hussein met with Syrian Foreign Minister Bassam Sabbagh in Baghdad on Wednesday, saying that Iraq viewed developments in Syria with grave concern.
The leader of the Syrian rebels, Abu Mohammad al-Golani, himself began his fighting career with Al Qaeda in Iraq, where he was imprisoned by the U.S., before moving to Syria to set up the extremist group’s franchise there.
Golani split from Al Qaeda in 2016 and on Thursday urged Sudani to prevent the PMF from intervening in Syria, saying in a video posted online that the rebels wanted to have strategic and economic ties to Iraq once they toppled Assad’s regime.
“They may claim to be in a different mood and a different group, but they very much look the same from Iraq,” the government adviser said.
This post is originally published on INVESTING.
