Starling Bank Faces £29 Million Fine from FCA over Financial Crime

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has imposed a fine of
£28,959,426 on Starling Bank Limited. The fine is for failings related to
financial crime, specifically concerning the bank’s financial sanctions
screening process.

The FCA also found that Starling repeatedly breached a
requirement prohibiting it from opening accounts for high-risk customers.

Starling’s High-Risk Account Openings

Starling Bank experienced rapid growth in its customer base,
increasing from around 43,000 customers in 2017 to 3.6 million in 2023.
However, the measures the bank implemented to fight financial crime did not
keep pace with this expansion.

In 2021, the FCA reviewed the financial crime controls of
various challenger banks and identified significant concerns regarding
Starling’s anti-money laundering and sanctions framework.

As a result of these findings, the FCA mandated that
Starling restrict the opening of new accounts for high-risk customers until
improvements were made. Despite this requirement, Starling opened over 54,000
accounts for 49,000 high-risk customers between September 2021 and November
2023.

FCA Investigation Takes 14 Months

In January 2023, Starling discovered that its automated
screening system had only screened customers against a small portion of the
complete list of individuals subject to financial sanctions since 2017.

An
internal review revealed systemic issues within its financial sanctions
framework. Following this review, Starling reported multiple potential breaches
of financial sanctions to the appropriate authorities.

Therese Chambers, FCA, Source: LinkedIn

“Starling’s financial sanction screening controls were
shockingly lax. It left the financial system wide open to criminals and those
subject to sanctions,” commented Therese Chambers, Joint Executive Director of Enforcement
and Market Oversight.

“It compounded this by failing to properly comply with FCA
requirements it had agreed to, which were put in place to lower the risk of
Starling facilitating financial crime.”

The investigation into Starling’s practices took 14 months,
significantly shorter than the average of 42 months for cases concluded in
2023/24. In response to these findings, Starling Bank has implemented
programs to address the breaches and improve its overall financial crime
control framework.

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has imposed a fine of
£28,959,426 on Starling Bank Limited. The fine is for failings related to
financial crime, specifically concerning the bank’s financial sanctions
screening process.

The FCA also found that Starling repeatedly breached a
requirement prohibiting it from opening accounts for high-risk customers.

Starling’s High-Risk Account Openings

Starling Bank experienced rapid growth in its customer base,
increasing from around 43,000 customers in 2017 to 3.6 million in 2023.
However, the measures the bank implemented to fight financial crime did not
keep pace with this expansion.

In 2021, the FCA reviewed the financial crime controls of
various challenger banks and identified significant concerns regarding
Starling’s anti-money laundering and sanctions framework.

As a result of these findings, the FCA mandated that
Starling restrict the opening of new accounts for high-risk customers until
improvements were made. Despite this requirement, Starling opened over 54,000
accounts for 49,000 high-risk customers between September 2021 and November
2023.

FCA Investigation Takes 14 Months

In January 2023, Starling discovered that its automated
screening system had only screened customers against a small portion of the
complete list of individuals subject to financial sanctions since 2017.

An
internal review revealed systemic issues within its financial sanctions
framework. Following this review, Starling reported multiple potential breaches
of financial sanctions to the appropriate authorities.

Therese Chambers, FCA, Source: LinkedIn

“Starling’s financial sanction screening controls were
shockingly lax. It left the financial system wide open to criminals and those
subject to sanctions,” commented Therese Chambers, Joint Executive Director of Enforcement
and Market Oversight.

“It compounded this by failing to properly comply with FCA
requirements it had agreed to, which were put in place to lower the risk of
Starling facilitating financial crime.”

The investigation into Starling’s practices took 14 months,
significantly shorter than the average of 42 months for cases concluded in
2023/24. In response to these findings, Starling Bank has implemented
programs to address the breaches and improve its overall financial crime
control framework.

This post is originally published on FINANCEMAGNATES.

  • Related Posts

    Weekly Brief: My Forex Funds Negotiating with CFTC?, Bitcoin Nears $100K, and More

    Prop Firm My Forex Funds and the CFTC Are Probably Negotiating a Settlement There is a high probability that a settlement deal is being negotiated between the proprietary trading firm…

    SEC Fines Webull, Two Brokers-Dealers for Compliance Failures

    US-based electronic trading platform Webull is among three companies that settled with the US securities regulator regarding suspicious activity reports that did not include important and required information. Webull Financial,…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    Russia’s claim of emissions in annexed Ukraine regions draws protests at COP29

    • November 23, 2024
    Russia’s claim of emissions in annexed Ukraine regions draws protests at COP29

    Weekly Brief: My Forex Funds Negotiating with CFTC?, Bitcoin Nears $100K, and More

    • November 23, 2024
    Weekly Brief: My Forex Funds Negotiating with CFTC?, Bitcoin Nears $100K, and More

    Oil prices settle up 1% at 2-week high as Ukraine war intensifies

    • November 22, 2024
    Oil prices settle up 1% at 2-week high as Ukraine war intensifies

    COP29 climate summit overruns as $250 billion draft deal stalls

    • November 22, 2024
    COP29 climate summit overruns as $250 billion draft deal stalls

    SEC Fines Webull, Two Broker-Dealers for Compliance Failures

    • November 22, 2024
    SEC Fines Webull, Two Broker-Dealers for Compliance Failures

    SEC Fines Webull, Two Brokers-Dealers for Compliance Failures

    • November 22, 2024
    SEC Fines Webull, Two Brokers-Dealers for Compliance Failures