FCA Is Considering Easing Consumer Duty Rules

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the United Kingdom is considering reducing the regulatory burden on firms by removing the “need for a Consumer Duty Board Champion” and delaying the introduction of new consumer protection rules if they are already addressed under the existing duty.

The British regulator’s plans were disclosed in a letter from its CEO, Nikhil Rathi, to the UK’s Prime Minister, Chancellor, and Secretary of State, which was made public last week. The letter highlighted the FCA’s intentions to cut several bureaucratic obstacles.

Mandatory Consumer Duty Rules

The Consumer Duty rules came into effect at the end of July last year, covering the broader financial services sector in the UK and targeting services offered to retail customers. These regulations also directly affected the trading industry, including forex and contracts for differences (CFDs) brokers.

However, the mandatory Duty rules have placed a substantial financial burden on companies. According to Reuters, firms incurred an estimated one-time cost of GBP 2.4 billion ($3.1 billion) to implement the Consumer Duty rules, along with increased operational expenses.

An FCA license is regarded as one of the most stringent for any CFD broker. While a few years ago, such brokers could operate across the European Economic Area by passporting a single license, this provision ended with Brexit’s finalisation.

Recently, the FCA revealed that none of the 100 EU-based CFD brokers that opted for temporary permission after Brexit pursued permanent authorisation.

Boosting Growth Is the Priority

The FCA’s priority now is to ease companies’ financial burdens.

“We could go even further and, with Government support, reduce costs of anti-money laundering measures, relaxing know-your-customer requirements on small transactions,” the letter stated.

The letter further outlined that the British watchdog’s primary strategy until 2030 is to promote growth.

“We already had significant work in progress for this year, which I set out below, along with new proposals that go further,” the letter added. “We have listed ideas to test with you and through wider consultation, which we would conduct as quickly as possible, including with our statutory panels. This will be supported by academic research we have commissioned to better understand the links between financial regulation and growth.”

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the United Kingdom is considering reducing the regulatory burden on firms by removing the “need for a Consumer Duty Board Champion” and delaying the introduction of new consumer protection rules if they are already addressed under the existing duty.

The British regulator’s plans were disclosed in a letter from its CEO, Nikhil Rathi, to the UK’s Prime Minister, Chancellor, and Secretary of State, which was made public last week. The letter highlighted the FCA’s intentions to cut several bureaucratic obstacles.

Mandatory Consumer Duty Rules

The Consumer Duty rules came into effect at the end of July last year, covering the broader financial services sector in the UK and targeting services offered to retail customers. These regulations also directly affected the trading industry, including forex and contracts for differences (CFDs) brokers.

However, the mandatory Duty rules have placed a substantial financial burden on companies. According to Reuters, firms incurred an estimated one-time cost of GBP 2.4 billion ($3.1 billion) to implement the Consumer Duty rules, along with increased operational expenses.

An FCA license is regarded as one of the most stringent for any CFD broker. While a few years ago, such brokers could operate across the European Economic Area by passporting a single license, this provision ended with Brexit’s finalisation.

Recently, the FCA revealed that none of the 100 EU-based CFD brokers that opted for temporary permission after Brexit pursued permanent authorisation.

Boosting Growth Is the Priority

The FCA’s priority now is to ease companies’ financial burdens.

“We could go even further and, with Government support, reduce costs of anti-money laundering measures, relaxing know-your-customer requirements on small transactions,” the letter stated.

The letter further outlined that the British watchdog’s primary strategy until 2030 is to promote growth.

“We already had significant work in progress for this year, which I set out below, along with new proposals that go further,” the letter added. “We have listed ideas to test with you and through wider consultation, which we would conduct as quickly as possible, including with our statutory panels. This will be supported by academic research we have commissioned to better understand the links between financial regulation and growth.”

This post is originally published on FINANCEMAGNATES.

  • Related Posts

    Weekly Recap: IG to Offer Crypto Trading, Why South America Leads in Prop Trading Success

    IG Group to offer crypto trading Starting off this week’s new recap, IG Group is expanding its services around digital assets as it prepares to launch spot cryptocurrency trading for…

    NAGA Ends Q1 2025 with Higher Revenue as Commission Income Improves

    The NAGA Group AG, which is positioning itself as a financial superapp, reported year-over-year increased revenue in the first quarter of 2025, driven by a rise in commission income. The…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    Weekly Recap: IG to Offer Crypto Trading, Why South America Leads in Prop Trading Success

    • June 7, 2025
    Weekly Recap: IG to Offer Crypto Trading, Why South America Leads in Prop Trading Success

    Trump and Musk Feud Effect on Stock Market and Dollar

    • June 6, 2025
    Trump and Musk Feud Effect on Stock Market and Dollar

    What Is a Petro-Currency and How Does It Work?

    • June 6, 2025
    What Is a Petro-Currency and How Does It Work?

    What Is Currency Peg Risk and How Do Traders Profit From It?

    • June 6, 2025
    What Is Currency Peg Risk and How Do Traders Profit From It?