EU Securities Regulator Sets 2027 Deadline for T+1 Settlement Transition

The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA)
aims to cut the time between trade execution and settlement by half by 2027.
ESMA has now put in place a plan to shift to the T+1 securities settlement from
the current T+2 settlement cycle.

This move seeks to enhance market efficiency, reduce
risks, and align the EU with global standards. The regulator believes this
shift will make the EU’s post-trade processes more efficient.

Faster Securities Settlement

ESMA’s latest report outlines the benefits of
transitioning to a T+1 settlement cycle, which would shorten the period between
trade execution and settlement from two days (T+2) to just one day (T+1).

The change aligns with broader goals to integrate EU
capital markets and support the Savings and Investment Union objectives. ESMA
recommends implementing the T+1 cycle on October 11, 2027.

This date reportedly avoids the logistical challenges
associated with transitioning during the busy November-December period and
steers clear of the first Monday of October, which often coincides with
end-of-quarter activities. ESMA stresses the importance of a coordinated,
simultaneous shift across all relevant financial instruments to ensure a smooth
transition.

The regulator also plans to align the EU’s move to T+1
with similar timelines in other European jurisdictions, minimizing cross-border
discrepancies and reducing operational risks.

Costs and Benefits

ESMA’s report highlights the potential advantages of
moving to T+1, including reduced counterparty risks, lower margin requirements,
and cost savings from better alignment with global markets.

Faster settlement reduces the time frame in which
trades can fail, thus minimizing risks and enhancing investor confidence.
However, the transition won’t come without its challenges. It reportedly
requires significant updates to the Central Securities Depositories Regulation and the settlement discipline framework.

Harmonization and standardization of processes will be
key to enhancing settlement efficiency. According to ESMA, this will likely
require investments in technology and infrastructure, pushing the financial
industry toward modernization.

Following the release of its final report, ESMA plans
to work closely with the European Commission and the European Central Bank to revise the existing rules on settlement efficiency.

The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA)
aims to cut the time between trade execution and settlement by half by 2027.
ESMA has now put in place a plan to shift to the T+1 securities settlement from
the current T+2 settlement cycle.

This move seeks to enhance market efficiency, reduce
risks, and align the EU with global standards. The regulator believes this
shift will make the EU’s post-trade processes more efficient.

Faster Securities Settlement

ESMA’s latest report outlines the benefits of
transitioning to a T+1 settlement cycle, which would shorten the period between
trade execution and settlement from two days (T+2) to just one day (T+1).

The change aligns with broader goals to integrate EU
capital markets and support the Savings and Investment Union objectives. ESMA
recommends implementing the T+1 cycle on October 11, 2027.

This date reportedly avoids the logistical challenges
associated with transitioning during the busy November-December period and
steers clear of the first Monday of October, which often coincides with
end-of-quarter activities. ESMA stresses the importance of a coordinated,
simultaneous shift across all relevant financial instruments to ensure a smooth
transition.

The regulator also plans to align the EU’s move to T+1
with similar timelines in other European jurisdictions, minimizing cross-border
discrepancies and reducing operational risks.

Costs and Benefits

ESMA’s report highlights the potential advantages of
moving to T+1, including reduced counterparty risks, lower margin requirements,
and cost savings from better alignment with global markets.

Faster settlement reduces the time frame in which
trades can fail, thus minimizing risks and enhancing investor confidence.
However, the transition won’t come without its challenges. It reportedly
requires significant updates to the Central Securities Depositories Regulation and the settlement discipline framework.

Harmonization and standardization of processes will be
key to enhancing settlement efficiency. According to ESMA, this will likely
require investments in technology and infrastructure, pushing the financial
industry toward modernization.

Following the release of its final report, ESMA plans
to work closely with the European Commission and the European Central Bank to revise the existing rules on settlement efficiency.

This post is originally published on FINANCEMAGNATES.

  • Related Posts

    Want to Work in Finance in London? Fintech, Compliance, and Risk Roles Are the Top Paths

    Financial services and fintech job openings in London climbed 14% compared to the same period last year, according to new data from recruitment firm Morgan McKinley, though hiring levels remain…

    Revolut Eyes $65B Valuation: Will It Step Up Its CFDs Push?

    Revolut is seeking a $65 billion valuation in a new funding round, up from the $45 billion mark at which existing shareholders sold their stakes last year. In its most…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    UK Struggles to Plug Fiscal Hole. Forecast as of 10.07.2025

    • July 10, 2025
    UK Struggles to Plug Fiscal Hole. Forecast as of 10.07.2025

    Want to Work in Finance in London? Fintech, Compliance, and Risk Roles Are the Top Paths

    • July 10, 2025
    Want to Work in Finance in London? Fintech, Compliance, and Risk Roles Are the Top Paths

    Short-Term Analysis for BTCUSD, XRPUSD, and ETHUSD for 10.07.2025

    • July 10, 2025
    Short-Term Analysis for BTCUSD, XRPUSD, and ETHUSD for 10.07.2025

    Revolut Eyes $65B Valuation: Will It Step Up Its CFDs Push?

    • July 10, 2025
    Revolut Eyes $65B Valuation: Will It Step Up Its CFDs Push?