Italy’s securities regulator, Consob, has issued a warning to investors about the risks associated with retail prop trading activities. It describes them as online
trading simulations that promise profits but may lead to financial losses.
Consob Flags Prop Firm “Trading
Games” as Potential Investor Trap
The Italian
market watchdog describes the prop trading industry very interestingly,
completely different from how the companies operating within it do.
The
regulator said these offerings, promoted on websites and social media platforms, “simulate an online trading activity in a type of finance video game aimed at passing skill tests and making a profit.” They are presented under various names, including “shadow investment game,” “funding trading,” and “financed trading accounts.” These simulations often require users to
enroll in paid training courses before participating in online trading
challenges.
According
to Consob, the schemes typically involve users progressing from simulated
trading to purportedly real trading using capital provided by self-described
“proprietary firms” or “prop firms.” To entice
participants, these firms offer to share some profits generated.
The
regulator emphasized that these simulations carry significant risks for savers and could result in the loss of
invested funds.
“Consob has
received several reports from users who have signed up for such offers. The
complaints concern both the level of difficulty of the tests, which are
allegedly contrived to push ‘players’ to try again, and the failure to share
the alleged profits.” The regulator commented.
Regulatory
interest in proprietary trading began in February, leading to the withdrawal
from part of the market by the popular trading
platform provider MetaQuotes, difficulties in access for investors from
the USA, and the suspension of operations by
some companies
Increasing Number of
European Regulators Warning Against Prop Trading
Similar
warnings have been issued by financial market supervisory authorities in
Belgium (FSMA) and Spain (CNMV), highlighting a growing trend of concern among
European regulators.
At the end
of May, Finance Magnates reported that the European Securities and
Markets Authority (ESMA) had convened a discussion on the regulations
concerning prop trading. Remonda Kirketerp-Møller, the founder and CEO of
regulatory compliance firm Muinmos, shared that “regulators have been
conducting studies, gathering data, and engaging in consultations with industry
participants to better understand the nature and implications of prop trading.”
Currently,
prop trading firms are primarily governed by laws such as consumer protection
rules, data protection regulations, and international sanctions conditions. These companies are predominantly registered in the US, the UK, the UAE,
and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, although many are also registered within
the EU.
In early
June, the Czech regulator indicated that prop trading firms “may be subject to
MiFID regulations.” The business models used by firms engaged in prop trading
(technically funded trader services) can take various forms, some of which may
be subject to the MiFID regulatory framework.” Notably, one of the leading prop
trading firms, FTMO, is based in the Czech Republic.
Although the industry is controversial among regulators and some investors, it attracts more clients. FX/CFD brokers are also taking advantage of this by increasingly adding proprietary trading offers to their basic services. This month, ThinkMarkets joined them by launching its own proprietary trading brand, ThinkCapital.
Italy’s securities regulator, Consob, has issued a warning to investors about the risks associated with retail prop trading activities. It describes them as online
trading simulations that promise profits but may lead to financial losses.
Consob Flags Prop Firm “Trading
Games” as Potential Investor Trap
The Italian
market watchdog describes the prop trading industry very interestingly,
completely different from how the companies operating within it do.
The
regulator said these offerings, promoted on websites and social media platforms, “simulate an online trading activity in a type of finance video game aimed at passing skill tests and making a profit.” They are presented under various names, including “shadow investment game,” “funding trading,” and “financed trading accounts.” These simulations often require users to
enroll in paid training courses before participating in online trading
challenges.
According
to Consob, the schemes typically involve users progressing from simulated
trading to purportedly real trading using capital provided by self-described
“proprietary firms” or “prop firms.” To entice
participants, these firms offer to share some profits generated.
The
regulator emphasized that these simulations carry significant risks for savers and could result in the loss of
invested funds.
“Consob has
received several reports from users who have signed up for such offers. The
complaints concern both the level of difficulty of the tests, which are
allegedly contrived to push ‘players’ to try again, and the failure to share
the alleged profits.” The regulator commented.
Regulatory
interest in proprietary trading began in February, leading to the withdrawal
from part of the market by the popular trading
platform provider MetaQuotes, difficulties in access for investors from
the USA, and the suspension of operations by
some companies
Increasing Number of
European Regulators Warning Against Prop Trading
Similar
warnings have been issued by financial market supervisory authorities in
Belgium (FSMA) and Spain (CNMV), highlighting a growing trend of concern among
European regulators.
At the end
of May, Finance Magnates reported that the European Securities and
Markets Authority (ESMA) had convened a discussion on the regulations
concerning prop trading. Remonda Kirketerp-Møller, the founder and CEO of
regulatory compliance firm Muinmos, shared that “regulators have been
conducting studies, gathering data, and engaging in consultations with industry
participants to better understand the nature and implications of prop trading.”
Currently,
prop trading firms are primarily governed by laws such as consumer protection
rules, data protection regulations, and international sanctions conditions. These companies are predominantly registered in the US, the UK, the UAE,
and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, although many are also registered within
the EU.
In early
June, the Czech regulator indicated that prop trading firms “may be subject to
MiFID regulations.” The business models used by firms engaged in prop trading
(technically funded trader services) can take various forms, some of which may
be subject to the MiFID regulatory framework.” Notably, one of the leading prop
trading firms, FTMO, is based in the Czech Republic.
Although the industry is controversial among regulators and some investors, it attracts more clients. FX/CFD brokers are also taking advantage of this by increasingly adding proprietary trading offers to their basic services. This month, ThinkMarkets joined them by launching its own proprietary trading brand, ThinkCapital.
This post is originally published on FINANCEMAGNATES.
