Banking Giant’s Discount Disaster Affects 24,000 Customers

Westpac New Zealand has admitted to overcharging more than
24,000 customers approximately NZ$6.35 million through systematic failures in
its discount and benefits programs, according to court proceedings initiated by
the Financial Markets Authority (FMA).

Westpac NZ Faces Court Over $6.35M Customer Overcharging Scandal

The bank acknowledged making misleading representations to
customers through its Employee, Gold and Platinum packages, as well as other
business banking services. The violations occurred due to manual processing
errors and inadequate system controls that failed to properly apply advertised
discounts.

FMA Head of Enforcement, Margot Gatland

“Westpac’s issues stemmed from deficiencies in its systems
that meant the bank failed to deliver to them contractually agreed discounts,” FMA
Head of Enforcement, Margot Gatland, said.
„Westpac used preferential pricing to attract and retain customers, without
having systems that could reliably deliver on those promises.”

The bank’s internal processes relied heavily on manual
record-keeping, with staff required to manually note customer eligibility for
package benefits. This flawed system resulted in up to 31% of eligible
customers not receiving their entitled discounts on subsequent products and
services.

Impact on Business Customers

Small business clients holding Business Transact Accounts
were particularly affected by incorrect charge codes, leading to higher
maintenance fees and missed transaction fee waivers. Account statements
incorrectly displayed these inflated charges as legitimate fees.

“The FMA acknowledges Westpac’s full cooperation throughout
the FMA’s investigation, and the work it undertook to remedy the issues,”
commented Gatland.

Westpac Faces Regulatory Challenges in Oceania

Westpac Banking Corporation has faced significant regulatory
penalties in recent years. In 2020, the Australian Transaction Reports and
Analysis Centre (AUSTRAC) announced an agreement with the bank to impose a $1.3
billion penalty for breaches of the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism
Financing Act 2006 (AML/CTF Act). AUSTRAC highlighted that the fine reflects
the severity and scale of Westpac’s compliance failures.

More recently, in January 2024, the Australian Federal Court
ordered Westpac to pay a $1.8 million penalty for engaging in unconscionable
conduct during a $12 billion interest rate swap transaction in October 2016.
This transaction, the largest in Australian financial market history, involved
a consortium of AustralianSuper and IFM entities acquiring a majority stake in
Ausgrid from the New South Wales Government.

Westpac New Zealand has admitted to overcharging more than
24,000 customers approximately NZ$6.35 million through systematic failures in
its discount and benefits programs, according to court proceedings initiated by
the Financial Markets Authority (FMA).

Westpac NZ Faces Court Over $6.35M Customer Overcharging Scandal

The bank acknowledged making misleading representations to
customers through its Employee, Gold and Platinum packages, as well as other
business banking services. The violations occurred due to manual processing
errors and inadequate system controls that failed to properly apply advertised
discounts.

FMA Head of Enforcement, Margot Gatland

“Westpac’s issues stemmed from deficiencies in its systems
that meant the bank failed to deliver to them contractually agreed discounts,” FMA
Head of Enforcement, Margot Gatland, said.
„Westpac used preferential pricing to attract and retain customers, without
having systems that could reliably deliver on those promises.”

The bank’s internal processes relied heavily on manual
record-keeping, with staff required to manually note customer eligibility for
package benefits. This flawed system resulted in up to 31% of eligible
customers not receiving their entitled discounts on subsequent products and
services.

Impact on Business Customers

Small business clients holding Business Transact Accounts
were particularly affected by incorrect charge codes, leading to higher
maintenance fees and missed transaction fee waivers. Account statements
incorrectly displayed these inflated charges as legitimate fees.

“The FMA acknowledges Westpac’s full cooperation throughout
the FMA’s investigation, and the work it undertook to remedy the issues,”
commented Gatland.

Westpac Faces Regulatory Challenges in Oceania

Westpac Banking Corporation has faced significant regulatory
penalties in recent years. In 2020, the Australian Transaction Reports and
Analysis Centre (AUSTRAC) announced an agreement with the bank to impose a $1.3
billion penalty for breaches of the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism
Financing Act 2006 (AML/CTF Act). AUSTRAC highlighted that the fine reflects
the severity and scale of Westpac’s compliance failures.

More recently, in January 2024, the Australian Federal Court
ordered Westpac to pay a $1.8 million penalty for engaging in unconscionable
conduct during a $12 billion interest rate swap transaction in October 2016.
This transaction, the largest in Australian financial market history, involved
a consortium of AustralianSuper and IFM entities acquiring a majority stake in
Ausgrid from the New South Wales Government.

This post is originally published on FINANCEMAGNATES.

  • Related Posts

    This Prop Firm Expands Crypto Suite With 30 New Pairs

    Funded Trader Markets (FTM), a retail prop firm based in Cyprus, has significantly broadened its cryptocurrency trading options, adding more than 30 new crypto pairs to its platform. With this…

    Five Tiny Trades, One Massive Fine After Long Investigation

    An Auckland-based retail investor has been ordered to pay a penalty of NZ$198,000 after being found liable for market manipulation on the New Zealand Stock Exchange (NZX). The ruling brings…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    Short-Term Analysis for Oil, Gold, and EURUSD for 01.05.2025

    • May 1, 2025
    Short-Term Analysis for Oil, Gold, and EURUSD for 01.05.2025

    Short-Term Analysis for BTCUSD, XRPUSD, and ETHUSD for 01.05.2025

    • May 1, 2025
    Short-Term Analysis for BTCUSD, XRPUSD, and ETHUSD for 01.05.2025

    This Prop Firm Expands Crypto Suite With 30 New Pairs

    • May 1, 2025
    This Prop Firm Expands Crypto Suite With 30 New Pairs

    Five Tiny Trades, One Massive Fine After Long Investigation

    • May 1, 2025
    Five Tiny Trades, One Massive Fine After Long Investigation