BIS Exits from China Backed mBridge CBDC Project After BRICS Summit

The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) announced its
decision to exit the mBridge cross-border payments project, a CBDC initiative
in which China has been a key technology contributor.

China recently proposed open-sourcing the software, and the
Bank of China (Hong Kong) integrated mBridge to enable automated corporate
payments. BIS’s exit from mBridge aligns with rising geopolitical tensions and discussion
at the BRICS Summit on alternative payment systems.

BIS Exits mBridge Project

AgustĂ­n Carstens, General Manager, BIS, Source: BIS

AgustĂ­n Carstens, BIS General Manager, disclosed the
decision at the Santander International Banking Conference, clarifying that the
move reflects project progress rather than political issues or setbacks. After
overseeing mBridge for four years, BIS believes that participating central
banks
can continue developing the project independently.

“I would say that the project has been so successful that we
can declare that we have graduated out,” Carstens said. He added the bank was
leaving “not because it was a failure and not because of political
considerations” but rather because “it is at a level where the partners can
carry it on by themselves”.

mBridge, a blockchain platform, was designed to speed up and
increase transparency in cross-border payments using wholesale CBDCs (wCBDCs).
Launched in 2021, it includes central banks from China, Hong Kong, Thailand,
the United Arab Emirates, and more recently, Saudi Arabia, aiming to meet G20
goals for enhanced payment systems.

The platform reached its Minimum Viable Product stage
in June 2023, though further development is required before it can be fully
operational.

Meanwhile, a
report published by the BIS examines the potential impact of money tokenisation

on central banks, as reported by Finance
Magnates
. Prepared for the G20, the report highlights the benefits, such as
lower costs and faster transactions, while stressing the need to address
associated risks in the regulated payments sector.

Geopolitical Tensions Impact mBridge

BIS’s departure from mBridge comes amid rising geopolitical
tensions around global payment systems. At the recent BRICS summit, the
proposal for a BRICS Bridge payment platform hinted at an alternative to the
current financial system dominated by the US dollar.

The platform’s discussion raised concerns due to the
involvement of countries like Russia and Iran, both under international
sanctions. During the summit in Kazan, Russia, President
Vladimir Putin criticized the US for using the dollar
“as a weapon” against
BRICS members. China and the UAE, both involved in mBridge, attended this
summit alongside Iran, the host nation.

Carstens distanced mBridge from the BRICS Bridge proposal,
stating, “mBridge is not the BRICS Bridge.” He emphasized BIS’s strict policy
of non-collaboration with sanctioned entities.

China’s Influence on mBridge

Despite this clarification, analysts question whether
China’s influence over mBridge may increase as BIS steps back. Some suggest
this could bring mBridge closer to China’s other cross-border financial
efforts, such as the Cross-Border Interbank Payment System.

This shift
could potentially reduce the oversight role of Western central banks, including
the US Federal Reserve and the Bank of England, which previously served as
observers.

Josh Lipsky from the Atlantic Council remarked that BIS’s
withdrawal might signal a division in CBDC development, with payment networks
increasingly reflecting geopolitical divides. He suggested Western central
banks might focus on alternative platforms, such as Project AgorĂĄ, supported by
central banks in Europe, Japan, Korea, and the US.

The BIS Steering Committee recognized BIS’s contribution,
while the participating central banks continue advancing mBridge toward full
production. The project marks a key step in digital currency development and
may influence the future of cross-border payments and global finance.

The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) announced its
decision to exit the mBridge cross-border payments project, a CBDC initiative
in which China has been a key technology contributor.

China recently proposed open-sourcing the software, and the
Bank of China (Hong Kong) integrated mBridge to enable automated corporate
payments. BIS’s exit from mBridge aligns with rising geopolitical tensions and discussion
at the BRICS Summit on alternative payment systems.

BIS Exits mBridge Project

AgustĂ­n Carstens, General Manager, BIS, Source: BIS

AgustĂ­n Carstens, BIS General Manager, disclosed the
decision at the Santander International Banking Conference, clarifying that the
move reflects project progress rather than political issues or setbacks. After
overseeing mBridge for four years, BIS believes that participating central
banks
can continue developing the project independently.

“I would say that the project has been so successful that we
can declare that we have graduated out,” Carstens said. He added the bank was
leaving “not because it was a failure and not because of political
considerations” but rather because “it is at a level where the partners can
carry it on by themselves”.

mBridge, a blockchain platform, was designed to speed up and
increase transparency in cross-border payments using wholesale CBDCs (wCBDCs).
Launched in 2021, it includes central banks from China, Hong Kong, Thailand,
the United Arab Emirates, and more recently, Saudi Arabia, aiming to meet G20
goals for enhanced payment systems.

The platform reached its Minimum Viable Product stage
in June 2023, though further development is required before it can be fully
operational.

Meanwhile, a
report published by the BIS examines the potential impact of money tokenisation

on central banks, as reported by Finance
Magnates
. Prepared for the G20, the report highlights the benefits, such as
lower costs and faster transactions, while stressing the need to address
associated risks in the regulated payments sector.

Geopolitical Tensions Impact mBridge

BIS’s departure from mBridge comes amid rising geopolitical
tensions around global payment systems. At the recent BRICS summit, the
proposal for a BRICS Bridge payment platform hinted at an alternative to the
current financial system dominated by the US dollar.

The platform’s discussion raised concerns due to the
involvement of countries like Russia and Iran, both under international
sanctions. During the summit in Kazan, Russia, President
Vladimir Putin criticized the US for using the dollar
“as a weapon” against
BRICS members. China and the UAE, both involved in mBridge, attended this
summit alongside Iran, the host nation.

Carstens distanced mBridge from the BRICS Bridge proposal,
stating, “mBridge is not the BRICS Bridge.” He emphasized BIS’s strict policy
of non-collaboration with sanctioned entities.

China’s Influence on mBridge

Despite this clarification, analysts question whether
China’s influence over mBridge may increase as BIS steps back. Some suggest
this could bring mBridge closer to China’s other cross-border financial
efforts, such as the Cross-Border Interbank Payment System.

This shift
could potentially reduce the oversight role of Western central banks, including
the US Federal Reserve and the Bank of England, which previously served as
observers.

Josh Lipsky from the Atlantic Council remarked that BIS’s
withdrawal might signal a division in CBDC development, with payment networks
increasingly reflecting geopolitical divides. He suggested Western central
banks might focus on alternative platforms, such as Project AgorĂĄ, supported by
central banks in Europe, Japan, Korea, and the US.

The BIS Steering Committee recognized BIS’s contribution,
while the participating central banks continue advancing mBridge toward full
production. The project marks a key step in digital currency development and
may influence the future of cross-border payments and global finance.

This post is originally published on FINANCEMAGNATES.

  • Related Posts

    Zenfinex Partners with Your Bourse to Enhance Liquidity Services for Brokers

    London-based brokerage firm Zenfinex collaborated with Your Bourse, a technology provider offering risk management services. This collaboration aims to enhance trading services by integrating better technology. The company will reportedly…

    Dutch Regulator Investigates Vantage for Illegal CFD Offering

    The Netherlands’ Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM) has opened an investigation against Vantage Markets, a contracts for differences (CFDs) broker, and has also issued a penalty order for non-cooperation.…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    Oil prices ease on fears of higher output, sluggish demand

    • November 14, 2024
    Oil prices ease on fears of higher output, sluggish demand

    Asia FX weak as dollar surges to 1-year high on sticky inflation; Powell awaited

    • November 14, 2024
    Asia FX weak as dollar surges to 1-year high on sticky inflation; Powell awaited

    Oil prices muted after mixed US inventory data; more demand cues awaited

    • November 14, 2024
    Oil prices muted after mixed US inventory data; more demand cues awaited

    Oil prices edge down, forecasts for higher oil output, weak demand growth weigh

    • November 14, 2024
    Oil prices edge down, forecasts for higher oil output, weak demand growth weigh

    Japan planning $87 billion extra budget to fund stimulus package, paper says

    • November 13, 2024
    Japan planning $87 billion extra budget to fund stimulus package, paper says

    Oil rebounds slightly on short-covering as strong dollar caps gains

    • November 13, 2024
    Oil rebounds slightly on short-covering as strong dollar caps gains